@dreamwillie-blog

A not uncommon choice in adults, with quite a number of advantages.

What’s it like to own one?

As with all the high styles, keep stubbles away from the inverted foreskin. This model will give you a few extra wrinkles to take good care of, so reasonable hygiene approaches will be required.

Performance issues

None.

Reaction to it by others

Depending on how tan you are, nobody may notice a difference between yours and an uncircumcised penis with retracted foreskin. If you are very dark though, be prepared for people wondering  where the two-tone appearance came from.

Summary

A good alternative to low and loose circumcisions.

Restorers: this one is good news for you, because it means you will get glans coverage more quickly than with tight ones, and have plenty of inner foreskin to pull over the glans, too.

Circumcision Seekers: I would consider this one as a serious option. It gives you the peacock factor of the high and tight with its two tone coloration, without restricting you as much in the masturbation department.

Growers: The shaft skin will accordion in and out behind the glans,  but not much else will happen.

Show-ers: No concerns.

This version is not so easily obtained as an adult, except through surgeons who understand the special needs of those particularly requesting it. It is  the race car among the choices.  It is THE proverbial porno penis.

What’s it like to own one?

In an everyday scenario, probably the only irritant here would be stubbles if you shave your pubic hair, because they would be brushing right up against that large expanse of inverted, inner foreskin. Better stay stubble free.

Performance issues

No mobile shaft skin – you do the math.

Reaction to it by others

This model is easily the most visually aggressive, and just short of having a paint job and print saying “Look! Circumcised! Big time!” It is probably the human equivalent to peacocks spreading their feathers. Consequentially, people will look.

Summary

This one is for enthusiasts.

Restorers: C.I.1 – a long way to go, I’m afraid, but on the upside, once you get there, you will be as good as new, because you have so much inner foreskin that will align perfectly with the glans.

Circumcision Seekers: If tight is for you, then the choice between this model and the low one will be driven by the question whether you want looks, or sensations. It’s a question of whether one is more vain, or more hedonist.

Growers: Variability of this version is  pretty much non-existent.

Show-ers: As above.

The tight cuts are the favourites of many seeking circumcision, and the bane of those seeking foreskin restoration. They are often the result of childhood procedures, because the growth of the penis may well lead to this result over time, even when the original circumcision was not that tight. In adults, tight circumcisions are often the result of second circumcisions, which some undergo to achieve added tightness. This particular version enjoys the UN’s recommendation, as it is thought to provide particular benefits regarding cleanliness and a low count of Langerhans cells.

What’s it like to own one?

This one is as close to carefree living as one may get as a penis owner. It will always be squeaky clean, and the likelihood of infection with this and that is, according to various sources, spectacularly low. On the other hand, in the fun department, you are relying  entirely on the glans, as there aren’t really many other patches of sensitivity around any longer.

Performance issues

If anything, this one may cause the issue of taking a bit too long. Also, the immobile shaft skin is something not everyone may be prepared for.

Reaction to it by others

This version is largely agreed to be a very elegant one. No wrinkles, no immediately evident two-tone coloration…. The willie of photo models.

Summary

Restrictive in many ways, but apparently an effective safeguard against this and that, and many would say, very good to look at.

Restorers: This is stage C.I.2 for you.

Circumcision Seekers: If tight is for you, then the choice between this model and the high one will be driven by the question whether you want looks, or sensations. It’s a question of whether one is more vain, or more hedonist.

Growers: Variability of this version is  pretty much non-existent.

Show-ers: As above.

With an angled cut, this would be your textbook typical, European standard “radical circumcision”, and considered quite extreme there. With a straight cut, it is more likely a clamp result that didn’t turn out as tight as intended.

What’s it like to own one?

With one of these, you can live in peace. It feels clean and stable, the glans permanently exposed, and  none of the shaft skin will come forward and do funny stuff. The angled one is visually inconspicuous, and attending nude events in uncircumcised places won’t get you any stares. To many bystanders, this will still just look like a normal penis with the foreskin retracted. You’ll never have any issues with excessive tightness with this one, as the shaft skin is quite mobile, to the point where you can actually cover the glans and secure this with tight underwear if you want to, but it will easily snap back. You do already get the airy feeling of an exposed coronal sulcus, which is what many seeking tighter circumcisions are after.

Performance issues

With this one, using skin for masturbation is not so easy anymore. With the angled version, it is still doable within limits, because you can push a roll of skin up against the corona. For everything else, it’s practically faultless.

Reaction to it by others

You may get comments from US-educated nurses that it is a bit on the loose and wrinkly side, but it definitely is one of the most unproblematic models to sport in both circumcision-attuned and –unattuned places.

Summary

A very proven and no-worries model that does everything well. A bit like a Japanese compact car.  Slightly conservative, but easy to live with.

Restorers: This stage is C.I.3 for you. You will already notice looser shaft skin. Have fun.

Circumcision Seekers: This version may be worth a look, even if you are planning to go for more tightness, because the fact is that that tightness will eventually go away, and give you something more like this result anyway.

Growers: Variability of this version is  low. You will notice the skin pulling back, possibly even reaching a certain tightness upon erection, but the transition is not unpleasant at all.

Show-ers: For you, this model is already as stable as one of the tighter ones.

A rare model I have yet to encounter on the internet, but I know it is out there, because I’ve seen it myself. I believe this to be probably the best one if a circumcised one is what you want.

What’s it like to own one?

This model manages to score well in every way. It offers the striking visuals of near full glans exposure while still  giving you glans-hugging comfort around the corona. It lets you go commando without rubbing the corona against denim, it gives a satisfying range of motion for masturbatory efforts, the skin easily moves back and forth over the corona, which increases its diameter in action, and it has enough mobile skin for partners to find a meaningful grip; also, it is nearly maintenance free. This is the E-Class Mercedes among circumcised penises, in my opinion. It does everything well.

Performance issues

The only caveat with this one is that the angle of the cut is steeper than that of the corona, which is how it manages to maintain that little “roof” at the top. This may snatch on condoms if erection subsides; but when you think about it, once it comes to that, time to pull out anyway. The perpendicularly cut version is slightly less  glamourous masturbationwise than the angled cut, which enables the user to reach the corona all around with a roll of skin.

Reaction to it by others

In uncircumcised parts of the world, this one will simply look like an uncircumcised penis with the foreskin retracted.  Especially in Northern Europe, this one can therefore fly under the radar. Elsewhere, people may wonder about the little skin donut briefly, but have probably seen weirder things, so likely won’t dwell on it.

Summary

This type of penis is brilliant for all purposes, except if you don’t like an exposed glans, which this one does largely have.

Restorers: This stage is the praised rollover, or C.I.4 for you. Congrats.

Circumcision Seekers: If you absolutely won’t have  a slight overlap onto the glans, you may want to move on and choose a different model.

Growers: Variability of this version is  quite acceptable. It is unlikely that you will experience jammed hair, or overly noticeable , autonomous retraction.

Show-ers: You get  a very good compromise of high glans exposure and skin availability for recreational purposes with this one.

This one is a little more assertive than the minimal circumcision style, but still a very conservative, foreskin-retaining approach favoured by doctors who don’t buy into the idea of full glans exposure. It is very common in Europe, if not to say probably the most common circumcision style in that part of the world. If you are going to undergo circumcision in Europe, it is likely that most surgeons will resort to it by default.

What’s it like to own one?

If there is a clown among penises, this one is it. Skin mobility with this one is off the chart if the frenulum has been removed – if you are planning to become a penis puppeteer, this one is for you. There is never a dull moment with this one. It will always be either on its way to engulfing the glans, or exposing it, rolling the skin inside out with as much drama as ever possible. You will constantly be reminded that you have a penis, and that it is busy as hell.

Performance issues

As you would expect from a clown, it is flinging condoms about uncontrollably, it gathers surprising quantities of underwear fluff around the glans during the day to baffle you with in the evening, it pulls you by the pubic hair until you engage in silly walks, and it still somehow smells funny. Having said that, its capabilities in the masturbation department are very convincing.

Reaction to it by others

With this one, you are treading the middle ground between instant commiseration and eventual appreciation by partners. I’ve been laughed at for mine by someone from the Middle East. Of course, it’s a clown. This model assures you completely exotic status anywhere you go except perhaps some of the more boring parts of Germany, because everyone else considers this outcome equally weird.

Summary

I really cannot recommend this style to anyone, unless you are trying to go crazy. It acts up 24/7, it causes you pain whenever it likes to just by jamming pubic hair between glans and foreskin, and it looks like  a pretzel dog.

Restorers: This stage will provide you with automatic coverage when flaccid

Circumcision Seekers: Lasting glans exposure when flaccid is not achievable with this model

Growers: the shown and described dynamics apply to you in particular

Show-ers: The descriptions above may be less  true for you, as the variability factor is not as strong in your case.

The Minimally Circumcised Member

The typical, conservative “phimosis  operation” favoured by surgeons trying to alleviate only phimotic constriction, which is typically found at the far end of the foreskin, without compromising glans coverage or frenulum. Very common in Europe, and there are those who say that this used to be the original, Biblical circumcision style. Likely story, considering the surgical standards of the time.

What’s it like to own one?

The ownership experience wouldn’t differ much from having a perfectly normal penis, except for the aspect that the absence of the tapered , distal part of the foreskin makes this type of penis more susceptible to skin rolling back by itself upon erection ,  a bit like a shirt sleeve that is turned inside out. This can feel  strange, like an eyelid inverting. On the whole, it’s a bit like having a short foreskin that tends to do somersaults by itself at the onset of an erection.

Performance issues

Condoms may easily be at odds with this model, interrupting sex often for condom adjustment. Hygiene issues are almost as on an uncircumcised version, although the intensity of the problem is already somewhat diminished. On a scale from surströmming to salmon, we’d have to give this one a rating of approximately tuna.

Reaction to it by others

This is a way of being circumcised without anyone knowing for sure.  Sutures will give it away though. You may still qualify for exotic status in Asia, Europe, and South America, but brace yourself for polite refusals of admission to circumcised only clubs everywhere else. Don’t be sad. You could go watch a movie instead. Or star in one that needs a nude model for Moses.

Summary

This type of penis is ideal for double agents commuting between Russia and Israel. You can look uncircumcised in Russia, and prove circumcision status in Israel if cornered. While not having any aesthetic graces, it is better than phimosis – which may still befall you with an even higher likelihood than it would with a natural model, because the scar tissue may cause it.

Restorers: This may well be a point to call it a foreskin and enjoy the good things in life from here onwards.

Circumcision Seekers: If this is  where you are at now, you still have all options open to create something more interesting.

Growers: The illustration shows what to expect if you have a long or absent frenulum. Particularly restorers may see these dynamics taking place.

Show-ers: Your actual variability may be lower than shown in the illustration, especially if you have a frenulum.

The standard model people continue to be born with, even though some societies have been trying their best to chop off foreskins for so long now that one does wonder if evolution actually really works.  Obtaining one of these penises is therefore quite easy. You just need to be born.

What’s it like to own one?

Owning an uncircumcised penis  is a jiffy up until the day one encounters partners not used to them, or a phimosis.  They are very comfortable, and keep the glans safe from touching underwear or worse. Most of the foreskins  are long enough to keep the glans covered even during erection, which means it’s perfect for going commando in scratchy clothing or full body armour. Masturbation is extremely user friendly, as the foreskin is like having your own fleshlight with you at all times. Having one of these makes you a risk taker regarding the climbing of trees in the nude, or crawling through the undergrowth in dangerous places. It also means you can safely take a leak outside in Siberia in February, and your glans will not be subject to frost bite, even if the rest of you is.

Performance issues

The long skin tube can get itself into untidy entanglements with underwear,  and needs frequent straightening out. It also often actively fights off condoms, making condom sex a sometimes frustrating exercise of frequent condom adjustment. Those with a relaxed attitude toward hygiene may draw the wrath of their sex partners, as anyone would– only that, with a long foreskin, they really may have a point. Accumulations of sperm under the prolonged influence of urine in an anaerobe environment can trigger the gag reflex in some unsuspecting participants., except those who like dead possums.

Reaction to it by others

In Asia, Europe, and South America, an uncircumcised penis will be readily recognized as a perfectly normal one. Elsewhere, having a foreskin will be deemed extravagant and somewhat deficient, a bit like sporting a umbilical cord in America. And it may be seen as an open invitation to religious confrontation in the Middle East. Showering before bedtime activities can begin is more likely to be requested of foreskin owners.

Summary

This type of penis is ideal for celibate pirates, hunter gatherers living in  forests, and orang-utans. It’s a man-thing. It is also a prerequisite for becoming a spy in Russia, and generally more suited to users who need quick and frequent access to stealthy masturbation options. It is perpetually threatened by phimosis, which can hit anyone out of left field, so enjoy while it lasts.

Restorers: If you’ve made it this far, congrats, time to retire. If you are going to continue, be sure to call Guinness.

Circumcision Seekers: This is obviously your starting point. Choose wisely.

Intactivists: People who advocate leaving the foreskin well alone, and who tend to like absolutely everything about it, often even the flinchworthy bits . Can be recognized by spamming internet forums with lengthy, lovingly prepared, copy-pasted posts, extolling the grandeur and beauty of having a foreskin, and the wretchedness of human existence in its absence.

Pro-Circ: People who advocate circumcision, and view the foreskin with great worry. Can be recognized by usually being from Minnesota and mumbling about cleanliness and locker rooms.

Circumsexual: People who get a sexual kick out of the topic of circumcision. Considered a bit deviant by intactivists. Can be recognized by having many fake email accounts enabling them to create raving majorities of circumcision-advocating “females” on internet forums.

Circumfetishist: People who get debilitatingly strong, sexual kicks ONLY out of the topic of circumcision. Considered evil by intactivists. Can be recognized by deteriorating syntax and grammar as internet postings on the topic coincide with masturbatory timing, and usually own castles in Romania with many prisoners awaiting circumcision.

Frenulum: a kind of natural safety belt for the foreskin, keeping it anchored to the underside of the glans to prevent the skin tube from getting twisted up or flopping about too much.

Glans: the fun bob at the end of the penis most of the action centers around in pornos, and whose sensitivity is said to be extinguished by circumcision according to its opponents, or vastly enhanced according to circumcision proponents.

Inner Foreskin: The lining of the foreskin, which is approximately the size of Austria, and contains enough nerve endings to wire up the whole solar system. It also contains enough Langerhans cells to spell certain death to anyone having sex in Africa, which is pretty much where the whole controversy about it comes from. Generally viewed as fun to have lots of.

Outer Foreskin: The hairy, wrinkled skin tube attached to the uncircumcised majority of the world’s male inhabitants, visually thought to be vaguely related to elephant trunks by some, and lined  on the inside with > inner foreskin.

Tight: The connoisseur’s style of circumcision, according to many views held by circumcision proponents, and a sadistic, anachronistic form of Victorian-inspired masturbation control as viewed by circumcision opponents.

Loose: The beginner level style of circumcision, according to circumcision proponents; viewed as a sign that not all hope is lost  regarding surgeons by circumcision opponents.

Corona: the rim of the glans, which, to prevent misunderstandings, does not benefit from having salt and a slice of lemon rubbed on it.

Smegma: A substance which tends to build up between foreskin and glans and which, depending on who is asked, is either the basis for having a functioning immune system, or spells certain death to entire families from a multitude of wretched ailments brought on by its existence.

Foreskin Restoration: Growing a new foreskin by pulling on it systematically over an extended period of time. Considered cheating by circumcision advocates, and pretty neat by involuntary circumcisees who use it to build their dream willies that way (as do, we should add, those undergoing adult circumcision)

Show-ers: Mis-spelt showers, or, in this context, men whose penis doesn’t change size much when getting erect.

Growers: Men whose penis  changes size dramatically when getting erect.

Smell: Let’s face it, folks, that part of the body will have a scent. Here the full scale we will be using to indicate performance on that aspect:

No Smell  > Salmon  > Trout  > Cod  >  Herring  > Sardines >  Tuna >  Mackerel > Lutefisk > Surströmming

COVERAGE

Foreskin Restorers use code to describe the extent of glans coverage they have. It equates circumcised coverage as follows:

C.I. 10: Natural penis without anything chopped off.

C.I. 09: Natural penis without anything chopped off, or short foreskin/ minimal circumcision.

C.I. 08: Natural penis without anything chopped off, or very short foreskin/ minimal circumcision.

C.I. 07: Minimal or partial circumcision.

C.I. 06: Partial circumcision.

C.I. 05: Partial circumcision.

C.I. 04: Low and loose circumcision with coronal coverage.

C.I. 03: Low and loose circumcision with exposed corona.

C.I. 02: Low and tight circumcision.

C.I. 01: High and tight circumcision.

Wankability: Ease of masturbation with skin

Variability: How much autonomous flopping back and forth there is of the skin over the corona between stages of flaccid and erect

Mobility: How far forward and backward you can pull the skin

Langerhans: in memory of scientist Langerhans, who discovered that skin cells of the inner foreskin are more susceptible to virus attacks. This rating therefore tells us how much inner foreskin there is.

Coverage: to what extent the glans is covered, on average throughout the day.

Apart from the different techniques used and the different levels of glans coverage achieved, circumcisions can also be done with the following four different, basic approaches, each of which results in very different dynamics of the male appendage in daily life, as far as the owner of it is concerned:

1.Perpendicular, circumferential cut: This result is achieved most frequently when clamps are used. The cut is perpendicular, and necessarily leaves a much wider gap on the underside of the penis between the cut line and the corona than it does on the upper side. This is contrary to the geometry of the glans, and can result in a naked underside and covered top of the glans if used in a loose or partial circumcision. In tight circumcisions, this is not a problem, and actually maximizes the amount of remaining, inner foreskin.

2.Angled, circumferential cut: When cut at an angle parallel to that of the corona, a more natural appearance can be achieved. It is more likely that coverage levels will be more even all around, as well as removing more of the inner foreskin, which is deemed important by those advocating circumcisions for reducing the number of Langerhans cells.

3.Contoured, circumferential cut: As the angled cut, but requiring a skilful freehand technique. This kind is the least artificial-looking approach, and often done in Europe, where circumcision is seen as  something  to be made as inconspicuous –looking as possible.  The cut line is a complex contour, following the exact shape of the rear outline of the glans, and forming a  forward-facing point on the underside, where the frenulum may or may no longer be attached.

4.Frenulum removed (possible with all of the above approaches): Without a frenulum, a loose circumcision tends to have a high range of skin mobility, with a pronounced tendency to “roll”. It means that pulling the skin back will cause the remaining foreskin to turn inside out, and it may well be possible to pull the rim of skin where the cut was made all the way to the base of the penis. Upon pushing the skin forward, it will eventually roll inward on its way to the tip of the glans. The sensation is not entirely pleasant, and can resemble what it feels like to turn an eyelid inside out. It also increases the likelihood of jamming pubic hair between glans and foreskin, which can pull disagreeably. This is a very different experience to what it is like to have a frenulum, which prevents rolling to a large extent, and will keep the front end of the skin close to the corona when pulled back.

Welcome to Dream Willies. I own a male appendage, like many of us do. They come in many different guises, as we all may have suspected for some time. Some of us are circumcised without owner input – sorry about that. Some of us have factory ones, and want to stay that way. Fine. And some of us are looking for aftermarket modifications leading to a shortening of the skin sleeve commonly referred to as the foreskin. Those procedures are called adult circumcisions.

Perhaps contrary to common knowledge, the outcome of that procedure can vary much in style, and requires a good understanding of terminology, and of each style’s resulting dynamics, to ensure an outcome matching your requirements. The material shown here on this site is not suitable for making choices concerning the circumcision of non-adults, because the degree of precision implied here is unattainable in that age group, and would not likely manifest.

Dream Willies is not what intactivists would call a pro-circ site. I distance myself from routine infant circumcision as an individual and author, and hereby introduce my site as a place where the raging debate between circumcision advocates and circumcision opponents should find a neutral space in which to objectively review the characteristics of circumcised penises as they are, thereby accommodating the needs of both groups to fully understand and describe the full reality of owning each of the variants shown here.

It may well be that intactivists and circumcision advocates are moving in opposite directions with their respective agendas, but it is inevitable that members of both groups will own similar models of penis. On this site, we want to know what everyone’s ownership experience with their variant is, no matter whether they are planning to increase or reduce glans coverage.  Why? Because I need to write a report for the ministry on my home planet.

The tone I chose for this site is humorous – not because I want to mock anyone, but because we need to keep things in perspective. Without belittling the emotions of either faction, we need to keep in mind that the focus here is pragmatic and observational. Call it scientific if you will. There is no agenda other than to understand more, with both sides of the argument giving input on a level that will hopefully remain mostly technical. I understand that intactivists and foreskin restorers are consumed by a desire to extend their foreskin length, and equally, that adult circumcision advocates are consumed by a desire to reduce theirs. It’s a subjective issue, with both sides gagging for objective facts to substantiate their preference, which is futile. The issue has dynamics not dissimilar to the question of whether the tea will be with or without sugar, as far as I am concerned. In the end, both sides want the same thing – their personal dream willie. May everyone get what they desire in the end, and be gentlemen along the way.

Please keep that in mind when you comment, as rude commentators will be fed to the crocodiles.