guess who from now on is boycotting nabisco (oreos and ritz are the only products i get from them) thanks to system of a down and genius lyrics
what the fuck nabisco is one of the top sponsors of porn IN THE WORLD
i already knew the palm oil was shit but they’re using our cookie money to fund porn…..what the fuck. what is this world?
here are its most popular products, and the wiki link to all the rest so you guys know what to avoid like the plague
and near tied as one of the biggest sponsors is general foods (now know as kraft general foods after the merger) here’s the big brands they own and profit from and here’s the wiki link for brands on those brands
don’t let your money be handed off to pimps and traffickers and rapists and the most evil people on earth.
I love wheat thins but because I’m not evil I love women more. Rest In Peace you little wheat squares
Tangentially related but here’s 2020s biggest brands profiting off of sexual exploitation, according to The Dirty Dozen List courtesy of the National Center for Sexual Exploitation:
3. Massage Envy
6. Seeking Arrangement
7. Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue
12. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts
You can find more information and the rundown for past years’ here.
JUSTICE HAS BEEN SERVED
The judge who sentenced this sexual predator is Rosemarie Aquilina. Larry Nassar abused over 150 women, including Gabby Douglas, Simone Biles, and Aly Raisman. Judge Rosemarie made sure this predator pays the price for each and every one of them. Hella props to this badass judge. Judges around the world need to take notes.
This is a gif of Judge Rosemarie tossing a bullshit letter larry nassar wrote about how “hard” it is for him to hear his victims testify. The level of badassary within this woman is untouchable.
we need more women like this in law
Frédé (Frédérique Baulé, 1914 - 1976) was called the “Amazon of Parisian Nights” and “Queen of Paris Lesbians”.
Twenty-two-year-old Frédé was working in the famous underground cabaret, Le Monocle, in Montparnasse. Marlene Dietrich, at the time the best-known and best-paid actress in the world, falls for deeply shy Frédé. In 1936 they embark on a relationship which witnesses say looked totally unbalanced, but it continues for more than 20 years, as evidenced by their correspondence.
Soon after meeting, Marlene set Frédé up in business with a nightclub called La Silhouette (after Marlene’s favourite bar in Berlin). It became known as Chez Frédé and catered to lesbians and cross-dressing women, but also to celebrities.
Errol Flynn describes Frédé in his autobiography: “She dressed better than any man I had ever seen. … her overall effect that of a sophisticated English schoolboy. Her man’s haircut looked better on her than on any man.”
La Silhouette did so well that in the late 1940s Frédé moved to a larger place, Carroll’s.
Frédé had a number of passionate relationships, and then she met American Marilyn Leff (Miki), seen above. In the 60s the trend of discotheques killed the cabaret, and the deeply loving marriage of Frédé and Miki killed the customers’ fantasy of seducing the mythical butch. Frédé and Miki swore fidelity and stayed together till the end. Frédé was diagnosed with leukaemia and moved with Miki to an old barn in Mareil-le-Guyon where she kept busy painting and planning her next club. She passed in February 1976, just before its opening.
could you even imagine the first time males mansplained creation to women… “actually, we are NOT here because of an endless chain of mothers like you giving birth going back eons in time. uhhhhh no … not at all. it really started when my bro this all powerful dude who lives in the sky made the first man and then a dumb woman who was TOTALLY inferior to him. yeah it’s surprising but legit. the wind told me when i was jerking off down by the river. i can’t prove any of this but if you don’t believe me i’ll kill you”
This post is cool because, according to my biology textbook, until very late in the development of science, men actually thought babies didn’t even share their mother’s bloodline, only their father’s. I mean, how much do you have to twist your percepction to come up with this
What the fuck, it’s in the mom’s tummy
They basically thought that the sperm contained a full human being and the womb was just the place where it grew.
Men have always overestimated their own importance.
“Men have always overestimated their own importance.”!!!!!!!!
for real guys look up the concept of women as ‘empty vessels’…john locke believed it, & art historians for a long time believed that women were incapable of creativity (usually founded on being empty vessels)
i remember reading a victorian novel that mentioned that women inherently lack the masculine power of creation/creativity and you just put that into an entirely new and weighty context
my mother believed until like, last year that children get the father’s name because the child has only the father’s blood
it never occurred to her that women made the entire world.
So incase you havent heard, Craig Brittain, the owner of a now banned website which encouraged and provided a platform for men to post private and nude photographs of their ex girlfriends online has now asked Google to remove links to stories about him as they feature ‘unauthorised photographs’ of him.
How about we make his sad ugly mug a little bit more well known.
As I think thats fair.
A man reaps what he sows. Here we have such a man.
The internet doesn’t forget
Anyway, this is him:
Keep reblogging to make sure his legacy lives on! :)
I reblogged this so fast lmao
What a piece of garbage lmao
“The Labrys is also associated with Amazons that was a legendary warrior society of women that did not follow the patriarchal culture…. Since the 1970s, the Labrys has been used as a symbol of independence and strength by feminists and lesbians.” – Ancient Symbols
We are aware that there is a pandemic going on
But there is also a mass attack on a homosexual community driven by the government officials in Poland
So we are marching again.
Dykes are not scared guys.
thinking about that WoW epidemic
i was telling my dad, ever the skeptic, about corrupted blood back in March at the start of lockdown, and how the cdc studied it. how it can be used as a model for what to do and how people might act in the event of an unpredicted pandemic, and how people were playing out the same behavior during covid.
he said “so they fixed it, right? how did they fix it in the game?” and i told him the truth: they didn’t. they couldn’t control it. they had to reset the servers and roll them back to the time before the ZG encounter.
a CNN article recently referenced another “viral” event in world of warcraft: leeroy jenkins facepulling as a metaphor for the expedited reopening of businesses. what it fails to mention however is how the video ends. everyone who charges in with leeroy dies. he wipes the raid.
it really feels like that meme where it’s like “wow, cool video game reference!” and the point soaring over their head says THE DAMAGE WAS IRREVERSIBLE. THE THREAT SPREAD TOO RAPIDLY AND EVERYONE DIED.
weird reframing of the corrupted blood incident to make it seem, for some reason, like it was all selfish actions that people said was unrealistic because real people would help others. in fact its literally the opposite, it was used as real world data specifically because of the player driven efforts to fix it
The reason this plague in the game was a good model is because we had all walks of life type people reacting in different ways.
Those with healing magic would go into infected areas to see if they could save the infected or at least keep them alive through the disease. Those that couldn’t do that tried to warn players before they entered infected areas. NPC could be infected and have “no symptoms”; they could be asymptomatic carriers and pass it to nearby players.
The best part though was by the time Blizzard had finally come out and said “if you are infected, try to quarantine yourself so you don’t spread it!!” the player base was ALREADY DOING SO. The players had recognized the problem and worked together in myriad ways to fix it.
They also had negative reactions as well, another reason this was such a good example of a real outbreak. They had a couple people report healers or alchemists who were claiming to sell cures/treatments to the disease that ultimately would do nothing. They had a group of players that would hide in the mountains near cities and just pass the disease back and forth between themselves and then raid cities to infect them all over again. They had higher level players start rebelling on the servers. Saying it was an overreaction and if you get it you’ll just die and you can come back and be fine, etc. Since they could get the disease and survive, ie it didn’t do enough damage to them since they were higher level, they felt it unnecessary to care about whether they got it or not. They complained about not getting to play like normal just because this plague could kill lower level players.
ALL of these reactions, good and bad, were real enough to what we assumed a real life epidemic would play out that people started to use it as a model. And now look, we have proof that it was accurate.
However, what we needed to learn from it was primarily that it wasn’t reversible. The bad reactions and lack of care from the few players that weren’t cooperating made it impossible in the end to contain. The only reason it was fixed at all is the game had to reverse time, literally just delete their entire game log a few weeks and time travel weeks into the past to before the plague even began.
Think about that.
The reason no one believed it was a valid model is that it was a video game and thus the consequences weren’t permanent. “No one would act like that in real life.” But look at how we are handling this outbreak. Is it not eerily similar?
And we can’t time travel.
this whole bella thorne onlyfans situation is like…. y’all are mad that she was able to get paid without having to show her naked body? the argument i keep seeing is “well people paid for a service and she didn’t deliver” and i have a couple things to say to that. 1. women getting naked for men’s pleasure isn’t a service that women are obligated to deliver on, no matter how much money men throw at us. do you guys hear yourselves right now? “people gave her money so she’s obligated to get naked for them” that’s literally the epitome of everything wrong with sex work: men’s belief that because they throw money at women that means they’re now entitled to our bodies and we’re obligated to give them whatever sexual favors they desire. 2. bella thorne explicitly said she wouldn’t be going full nude on her twitter page, y’all just didn’t listen. so, yeah, actually, she did fulfill her end of the bargain.
but even if she hadn’t said that, so what? you’re mad that a woman didn’t have to be sexually exploited in order to get her coin? do you not see how this is an argument against sex work? “this woman is bad because she’s not reliant on other people seeing her naked for money, so she’s messing it up for women who are reliant on that system”. onlyfans isn’t even a porn website, it’s just a subscription based website that people have turned into a porn website. if a celebrity had said “pay me for a one-on-one hangout” and they’d made the same amount of money bella thorne did in the same amount of time she did, would y’all have still gotten mad about that? because they aren’t getting naked but they’re still making bank?
if you believe that sex work is work, then celebrities are allowed to get into onlyfans, too. “well they already have the money!” ah, so you acknowledge that sex work preys on poor women who don’t have the financial stability to support themselves? and yet you’re still advocating for its legalization? listen: you can’t have it both ways. either sex work is work and anybody from any socioeconomic class can do it, or you admit that sex work is done primarily by poor women because they don’t have the ability to make money anywhere else due to the systemic obstructions that relegate women’s financial earnings.
either way: none of those things are bella thorne’s fault, and y’all need to stop attacking her like it’s her fault people were willing to pay a shitload of money to see her naked. aren’t pro-sex work people the same people who say “well, if men are willing to pay women for sex then why shouldn’t women sell sex?”
y’all wanted for celebrities and everyone else to support sex work, idk why you’re upset now that other people are getting into the game.
Thank you for this post. You articulated everything wrong with the people who participate.
If anything you shouldn’t expect teenage girls to look attractive. Especially if you are not a teenager. Teenagers are still growing and developing mentaly. To expect young girls to be skinny, with clean skin, and nice hair is just disgusting.
Leave them alone, damn.
especially when teenage boys walk around smelling like cow dung and look like they’ve been run over by a semi trailer. the obsession with teenage girls and their looks is an unpleasant mixture of brutal female socialisation (the control, beauty, subordinance, regulation etc.) and actual pedophilia.
Cows’ feces actually smell better than teenage boys
I’m getting my first hate mail y'all❤️🌫️🌫️🌫️
But you better be sending it to the mras, incels, neonazis and other violent men, not to a lesbian
The best genre to ever have existed
THIS IS HOW TO TAKE A TRASH OPINION COMIC AND MAKE IT BETTER.
Does anyone know who these artists are?? They’re brilliant and I’d like to credit them!!
I love that the internet saw people comparing women and other alienated groups of people and went, “they’re dating,” and, “they support each other.” We’re improving as a society.
These improved my day
pintoras :“Imagine a woman in the long skirts and high collar of the early 20th century standing in front of the painting she created. It is a massive piece—about 10 feet tall by 8 feet wide—and it is not a landscape, a portrait, a still life, nor a scene from myth or history. Dominating the composition is a bold yellow form reminiscent of a plant or sea creature, glowing amid colorful, biomorphic shapes and vigorous lines. This is just one of 10 such works that she has created almost entirely alone—sometimes walking on her work as she lays down the paint—and one of 193 radically abstract paintings that she has made in a few short years, between 1906 and 1915. None of these details fit with the story told in museums and art history courses. We know the first abstract painters so well that we often refer to them by last names alone: Kandinsky, Malevich, Mondrian. We know who is celebrated for doing “action painting” on giant canvases laid on the floor—Pollock. Each of these men has been lauded for opening a way into new territory. As it turns out, that territory had already been explored by another artist. Her name was Hilma af Klint.”
It gets even better.
The real kicker is that hers actally look like something done on purpose and with meaning and are actually visually appealing.
Not only visually appealing! I know people say this all the time as a joke, but it really does feel like they’re speaking to me on a spiritual level.
Just another example of men getting the credit for women’s creation and innovation.
By being a radfem you are not “celebrating lesbians” as your header says. You are disgracing them. You are erasing and ignoring the identities and loves of millions of trans women and nonbinary lesbians that have shaped and created lesbian culture across the world for hundreds of years. Do some research on trans lesbians, get your head out of your ass.
“Butches can be misogynistic to other women” like literally any woman. Have you ever met other women before?
So many women regardless of their presentation say misogynistic things to other women but butches get singled out because you see them as outsiders.
we COULD be examining toxic masculinity that exists for butches but instead y'all gotta go and be gross :(
please tell me WHAT toxic masculinity could i fucking have as a butch.
This mf lives in an alternative universe where a group of women can exhibit toxic masculinity
no they don’t they show the effects of the normalization of pedophilia in our society
and the way that capitalism has forced women to view their appearance as a commodity from puberty
Poor kid. I don’t know who’s advising her but they’re bad at their job.
Anyway, here’s what teen actresses looked like in the mid-90s for more on this so-called ‘cultural shift’:
You know what though? Let’s not shame Millie for it. Pick a random 13 years old girl today and she’ll look the same. My cousin showed up in london last month and between makeup, hair, ourfit and nails she looked at least 20 and I literally forgot at some point and accidentally offered her wine until I remembered she still likes hello kitty. All of her friends look the same too.
It’s not just actresses. There was a cultural shift. And God it must be stressful to be a preteen in the era of IG and snapchat and fb.
1994so y’all are gonna pretend that the 90s/ 200s were a GREAT place to be a teenage girl and these atrocities didn’t happen:
Britney Spears on the cover of Rolling Stone, 1999, age 16 (literally all of Britney Spears’s early career)
Dominique Swain, promotional image for Lolita, age 15, 1997
Natalie Portman, age 12, in Leon: The Professional, 1994
This shit isn’t new. Stop acting like it’s new and the past is somehow less shitty than things are now.
Let’s go past the 90s y'all.The 70s were awesome:
12 year old Jodie Foster in Taxi Driver
12 year old Brooke Shields in a promo shot for “Pretty Baby” And worst of all for Brooke Shields:
She was 10 when this was taken and she was make up and oiled up and she was nude. She lost the court case for the rights for the negatives and for it to stop being reproduced. : https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph
Yeah, I mean, unlike much of tumblr, I was alive in the 70s, and NONE of this is new. Please know that both Jodie Foster and Brooke Shields were playing prostitutes in Taxi Driver and Pretty Baby. And let’s not forget Brooke Shields in Endless Love and Blue Lagoon. There are so many movies from the 70s and the 80s which where about teens getting it on, with adults and other teens (Sooner or Later, Pretty Darlings, Porky’s, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, just off the top of my head). And the books, OH MY GOD, so many books about sex and losing your virginity. YA today is way more tame than it used to be (look up Norma Klein’s YA stuff, for example).
Let’s not pretend this is anything new. I mean, the whole Roman Polanski scandal didn’t happen yesterday. And it wasn’t new in the 70s either. Men have been exploiting young girls forever.
protect girls. protect girls. protect girls.
It’s so weird how when I’m watching old movies with people much older than me and something extremely misogynistic or pedophilic thing happens, they’ll say something like “it was a different time. That wouldn’t be allowed now” but when we see pedophilic imagery or oversexualition of women now, we’re told it’s a problem with “kids these days” or something along those lines.
It’s always presented like a specific decade or generation’s issue when in reality men have been creeps towards girls and young women since we’ve been walking upright 😓
It’s about power. They claim it’s “empowering” for young girls to dress like this, they tell teens that they’re interested because she’s “mature for her age,” but really it’s about the fact that preteen/teenage girls have less power than adult fucking men and they’re grooming them to be taken advantage of.
No one is saying that you MUST have sex with trans people.
Or fat people
Or disabled people
Or dark-skinned black people
Or or or….
When activists say things like “It’s transphobic to say that you aren’t attracted to trans women,” that doesn’t translate to “You absolutely have to find a trans woman right now and bone down!” Instead, what they’re saying is “The only thing that all trans women have in common is that they’re trans women. They all look different, act different, think different, have different bodies and are at different stages of transition. There is no way that you find every single one of them unattractive. To specifically single them out as a group that you dislike is based on stereotypes and bias, not reality.”
It benefits all of us to take the time to examine our internal bias. Recognizing that prejudice and reflecting on it is a good thing. Maybe your sexual or romantic leanings will never change. That’s okay. But let’s not just brush past these things by saying “It’s a preference” when really: these thoughts are based on a culture of discrimination, stereotypes and bigotry. Labeling them as such is a reflection on that culture, not on your love life.
It benefits all of us to take the time to examine our internal bias
no darling it benefits homophobic genderhets. next
The trait all trans women have in common is being male and that is why lesbians dont find them attractive. Nothing to examine here
why do radfems act like the hatred of periods stems from misogyny and not… y’know… how fucking gross and scary blood is to most people?? Like because it’s an inherently female thing it’s somehow pure and beautiful and not just as gross as an oozing cut?
there are literally thousands of paintings of men bleeding out in battle all over art galleries. most action movies are full of simulated wounds. the history of (european at least) masculinity is “if youre not bleeding what the fuck are you doing?” dont act like we, as a culture, dont lionize male bleeding.
“Why haven’t women considered the reason there’s a stigma is because there should be because it’s so icky and gross :/“
hey op, how is the fact that “blood is icky” translate into women being seen as impure and evil? even if theyre wearing a tampon and no blood is going anywhere - not even in gheir underwear let alone out in the open - why should that mean they be put in a tiny mud hut where they suffer in pain for a week and even risk death? why should that mean girls all over the world arent allowed to go to school? “blood is gross” therefore it’s widely accepted and enforced that women on their periods are irrational and over emotional and crazy and cant be trusted or taken seriously? just cos people dislike blood? really?
menstrual stigma has fuelled misogyny for millennia. cross-culturally in the ancient middle east and mediterranean, menstrual blood was seen as supernaturally polluting and associated with immorality, impurity, and putrescence that was necessarily part of women’s physical ‘inferiority’ to men.
Blood being “scary” doesn’t mean women and girls should be banished to menstrual huts where they face unsanitary conditions but nice misogyny I guess.
look, men abuse their power over women all the time. it doesn’t matter if they’re doctors, lawyers, police officers, construction workers, or whatever. they will always use their positions of power to assault women around them. not each individual one, but that’s what we have to assume to stay safe. however, gynecology is an entire section of medicine specific to women. by directly placing men in these positions of power, especially over women when they’re vulnerable, it contributes directly to gynecology abuse.
You don’t think an entire sex should be allowed into a profession, but I’m the ass? You say this despite claiming to care about those who might actually perfer that sex for when they need to see someone of that profession, but I’m the ass?
holy shit. omg. you’re braindead.
everyone has the ability to be a good gynecologist or any doctor at that, however men have tendencies to abuse their positions of power to rape patients (female or male) and also to wrongfully diagnose or ignore female patients, due to the lack of understanding of their bodies.
well because cancer patients don’t have the same rates of differences from those who don’t have cancer, as compared to female vs male patients.
female bodies are incredibly different than males (from the organs, like the cervix, uterus, fallopian tubes, vulva/vagina, to difference in conditions like heart diseases, COVID-19, etc). these differences lead to many male doctors not understanding the female body. hell, the differences even end up in women dying more in car crashes, becuase almost all car crash testing is done on male dummies, and hence cater to men’s survival.
no, because people aren’t born with cancer (st least not usually). however you are born male or female, and socialized as such. its not like cancer patients have high rates of rape and sexual abuse, the way men do.
okay but men make around 95% of all rapists regardless of the victim’s sex. lesbians and bisexual women do commit rape, but not nearly at the same rates as men do.
And predatory lesbian and bisexual gynecologists don’t exist?
Also, if a woman doesn’t want to see a male gynocologist she shouldn’t have to, but men should be allowed to be gynos.
If you don’t want a male gynecologist don’t go to one?
I’ve seen something similar to this before but have never seen tge argument that a female shouldn’t be urologists to male patients.
you realize that urology affects both females and males, right? gynecology is exclusive to females. that’s why only women should be able to treat other female patients.
Urologists deal with the male reproductive system. Yet no one demands that there be a male urologist anywhere a male might go to see a urologist. That’s might my point.
also, women don’t feel comfortable with male gynos because there are countless examples of men exploiting their power over their patients to sexually assault them.
Also, I know women see urologists, but for men, they deal with the reproductive system, yet no call for at least one urologist at a practice or hospital to be male.
men shouldn’t be gynos, because gynecology is something that affects only females, hence men shouldn’t have a say in it. also men tend to not understand the female body in several ways (some examples include heart attacks in women, menstruation problems, pregnancy problems, cervical/ovarian cancer, etc).
Do you also think all oncologists should have been cancer patients first?
this is a stupid ass question.
You’re the one claiming men don’t bave a female reproductive system so they couldn’t possibly understand it. How would an oncologist who never had cancer be any different than a male gynocologist by that logic?
someone without cancer can understand a cancer patient’s body because despite their diagbosis, they’re still relatable to the doctor. a male doctor has the ability to understand a female patient, but most do not and end up incorrectly diagnosing female patients.
So you admit that a male can be a good gynecologist. You just don’t think most would be. Why do you hate men? Also, have you ever considered that a female might be more comfortable with a male gynocologists because of bad or even traumatic experiences with females? Your hate of the idea of male gynocologists suggest you don’t care.
also of course i care about female patients trauma relating to other women, but women make less than 5% of rapists, so it’d not as common of an issue.
You can’t even stay consistent.
notice how i said “shouldn’t” and not “can’t”. illiterate ass.
Yeah, yeah, I know “more likely” this, “less likely” that. Problem is, that doesn’t tell you shit about the INDIVIDUAL.
i think you should be able to see a male gyno if you really need it, but the field should be vastly made of women. women are statistically more comfortable and satisfied with a female doctor than a male, and that’s it.
ANYWAY NO MALES IN GYNECOLOGY