#arvandlaw Tumblr posts

  • arvandlaw
    23.02.2021 - 2 monts ago

    The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to take up a case brought by various groups and state and local officials challenging a Trump-era rule that makes it more difficult for immigrants to obtain legal status if they use public benefits, such as Medicaid, food stamps and housing vouchers. The rule, issued by the Trump administration in August 2019, is still in effect in most states nationwide. It immediately met pushback, and was subsequently blocked by courts, following its release. #ArvandLaw is a full service immigration law firm located in the financial district of Manhattan and just minutes from the Immigration Courts at 26 Federal Plaza in New York City. Call us today for an evaluation of your immigration matter 212-323-7435 or 646-660-2658. #WeAreArvandLaw 🤘 #ArvandLaw #NoBanNoWall #NoH8 #Immigrantstrong 💪 #AsylumIsAHumanRight #DHS #USCIS #DeportationDefense #GreenCards #ImmigrationCourt #H1B #NIW #ImmigrationAttorney #RFE #NOID #Appeal #Deportation #DeportationOrder #AdjustmentOfStatus #B1 #B2 #ConditionalResidency #DACA #EB1 #EB1 #F1StudentVisa #H1B #Inspection #JVisa #K1Visa https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/22/politics/supreme-court-public-charge-rule/index.html?fbclid=IwAR1Jl20NYteQo1xkcRpcDC1hgYneIsPPoJeRDWGHxArvcBkSP-gEfNamJgQ (at Law Office of M. Ray Arvand, PC • An Immigration & Personal Injury Law Firm) https://www.instagram.com/p/CLo7i6RpVsp/?igshid=1xj3f9c2ncwzd

    View Full
  • arvandlaw
    02.11.2020 - 6 monts ago

    On November 2, 2020, the district court in Cook County, Illinois, et al v. Wolf et. al., (19-cv-6334), granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on their claim that DHS’s Public Charge Rule, 84 Fed. Reg. 41,292 (Aug. 14, 2019) violates the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et. seq. The district court specifically ruled that (1) the public charge exceeds DHS’s authority under the public charge provision of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(4)(A); (2) is not in accordance with law; and (3) is arbitrary and capricious. Therefore, the court immediately set aside the DHS Public Charge Rule nationwide without staying its decision pending appeal. DHS may not apply the public charge rule as of today, which includes the submission of Form I-944 and the information contained therein. The court also continued litigation as it relates to equal protection claim raised by Plaintiff Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Inc. (ICIRR). As of this time, USCIS has not posted any guidance on implementation of the order on its public charge website, but as noted above the vacatur of the rule is effective immediately. #ArvandLaw is a full service immigration law firm located in the financial district of Manhattan and just minutes from the Immigration Courts at 26 Federal Plaza in New York City. Call us today to see how you can be our next success story. Call us today at 646-660-2658 or 212-323-7435. #WeAreArvandLaw #Immigrantstrong 💪 #USCIS #Immigration #Visa #DHS #AsylumIsAHumanRight #FamilyGreenCard #EB1 #EB2 #RFE #PublicChargeRule #I944 (at Law Office of M. Ray Arvand, PC • An Immigration & Personal Injury Law Firm) https://www.instagram.com/p/CHGT-6rp9ja/?igshid=kj7p6639wt9a

    View Full